
See how dysfunctional the system gets when you throw out the scientific method of actually measuring things that are then called “facts”? But hey, who gives a f*ck when your retweets and followers are The “new math” is how you “innovate” and “disrupt” education - and make a name for yourself in the field. more funding which is a whole 'nuther scam of the 1% creating the underfunding to start with) to end up with the net result of actually having to deliver less education with more time (since you’re repeating the same learning with multiple methods). That requires more training for teachers and more teachers (i.e. And since we are incapable of depolarizing that issue and … be united in addressing it, the lazy solution that gives everyone political and blame-free cover is to teach all the methods, not impose any discriminatory biases, and spend 5 times the classroom time to learn 1 thing 5 different ways. Since teaching one method would be efficient at many, many levels, the problem becomes resolving the inherent discrimination that requires.

I created it for those parents who would maybe buy a membership if it was cheap.

It is what it is, and many schools/parents have embraced it. I did not create this thread to argue the membership message or the merits/drawbacks of this type of teaching tool. Of course, every kid wants membership because that is how you collect and earn all the really good loot. But like a video game the kids are bombarded with membership messages. Does your child use Math Prodigy at home/school? In my local schools it is being used.įor those who don’t know about Math Prodigy - it is a site where math is turned into a video game to teach children mathematics.
